Benchmark

Multi-shot leaderboard

Every model runs the same 40 prompts. A vision model scores each clip blind against the original prompt in a single pass, across visual fidelity, physics and motion, subject consistency, prompt adherence and audio sync. Scores are out of 5, and the 95% CI column shows how much a score could plausibly move on a re-run with this few samples. Full methodology.

Board: Overall · Hands · Faces · Liquids · On-screen text · Multi-shot · Lip-sync · Camera · Animals · Style · Image to video

Clip shown: every model here on the same prompt, “multishot-cafe-conversation”, so the preview is a fair comparison, not a cherry-picked best clip.

#	Model	Overall	95% CI	Fidelity	Visual	Physics	Consistency	Audio	Attempts	Gen (s)	$/run	Runs
1	OpenAI Sora 2 discontinued OpenAI	5.00	±0	5.00	5.00	—	5.00	—	1.00	217	—	4
2	Seedance 2.0 ByteDance	5.00	±0	5.00	5.00	—	5.00	—	—	237	—	4
3	Google Veo 3.1 Google	5.00	±0	5.00	5.00	—	5.00	—	—	131	—	4
4	MiniMax Hailuo 02 MiniMax	5.00	±0	5.00	5.00	—	5.00	—	—	300	—	4
5	MiniMax H3 MiniMax	5.00	±0	5.00	5.00	—	5.00	—	—	448	—	4
6	Kling 3.0 Turbo Kuaishou	5.00	±0	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	5.00	—	—	—	4
7	Seedance 2.5 ByteDance	5.00	±0	5.00	5.00	—	5.00	—	—	233	—	3
8	Grok Video xAI	4.71	±0.93	4.50	4.88	—	4.75	—	1.00	85	—	4
9	Runway Gen-4.5 Runway	4.64	±0.34	3.93	4.88	4.88	4.88	—	—	—	—	4
10	Kling 3.0 Kuaishou	4.58	±0.88	4.13	4.63	—	5.00	—	1.00	190	—	4
11	PixVerse v5.5 PixVerse	4.53	±0.62	3.78	4.78	4.78	4.78	—	—	—	—	4

Attempts is the average number of generations needed before one was usable, the number that actually decides what a model costs you. 95% CI is computed from that model's own runs on this board, not assumed. On a category board with only 4 runs per model, a wide CI is the honest reflection of a small sample, not a bug. Two models whose CIs overlap are not meaningfully different at this sample size.

Frequently asked

Which AI video model is best at Multi-shot right now?

As of 23 September 2026, OpenAI Sora 2 by OpenAI ranks #1 on Multi-shot on SlopTV's benchmark, scoring 5.00/5 across 4 scored runs (±0 at 95% confidence).